CodeSOD: We’ll Hire Better Contractors Next Time, We Promise

Nona writes: "this is the beginning of a 2100 line function."

That's bad. Nona didn't send us the entire JavaScript function, but sent us just the three early lines, which definitely raise concerns:

if (res.length > 0) {
  await (function () {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

We await a synchronous function which retuns a promise, passing a function to the promise. As a general rule, you don't construct promises directly, you let asynchronous code generate them and pass them around (or await them). It's not a thing you never do, but it's certainly suspicious. It gets more problematic when Nona adds:

This function happens to contain multiple code repetition snippets, including these three lines.

That's right, this little block appears multiple times in the function, inside of anonymous function getting passed to the Promise.

No, the code does not work in its current state. It's unclear what the 2100 line function was supposed to do. And yes, this was written by lowest-bidder third-party contractors.

Nona adds:

I am numb at this point and know I gotta fix it or we lose contracts

Management made the choice to "save money" by hiring third parties, and now Nona's team gets saddled with all the crunch to fix the problems created by the "savings".

This post originally appeared on The Daily WTF.